🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion say that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the problem is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation details a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer locations. Officials say it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Along the coast is situated the grave of a ex-soldier killed while working abroad. His parent said she lost sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to think this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

An absence of agreement over when and how to handle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some want additional sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to proceed for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the options. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need good local conversations to discover the right solutions for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the physical loss of sacred ground.